Where have all the women gone?

This morning I read an editorial in the Cincinnati Enquirer by Ruth Marcus, “One step forward, two steps back for women.” Marcus was recently at a Washington dinner where the genders split following the meal. The men watched basketball and the women talked politics. Some of the women there were “veterans of Geraldine Ferraro’s 1984 vice presidential campaign.” The question was raised, “Have things turned out better or worse for women in politics than we expected back then?”

The group unanimously concluded that they never would have expected that “27 years later there would not have been a woman president or vice president.”

Marcus alone “adopted the glass-half-full attitude,” giving Hillary Clinton the credit of being capable of winning the office of presidency, in the absence of the Barak Obama phenomena. She  notes, ” The overt sexism that Ferraro encountered—questions about whether she could bake muffins or, alternatively, pull the nuclear trigger—is inconceivable today.” But she also notes a new report by Princeton University of the “declining number of female students serving in leadership positions there.”

The Princeton report, ordered by President Shirley Tilghman, concludes, “‘We had assumed . . .that after the pioneering years of undergraduate coeducation at Princeton, women woud have moved steadily into more and more prominence in campus leadership. . .In fact, this was true through the 1980s and 1990s. But . . .there has been a pronounced drop-off in the representation of women in these prominent posts since around 2000.”

Marcus provides the explanation that she finds the “most persuasive and disturbing” for the lack of women serving in leadership positions, “Women don’t win these offices because women don’t run for them.”

But it’s really not all that simple, is it?

In 1975 when I was graduating from high school as valedictorian and trying to decide what to do with my life I contemplated becoming a nurse. My father’s words ring as clearly today as they did then, “Don’t be a nurse, be a doctor.” Now I don’t in any way mean to belittle the nursing profession. I have had enough overnight stays in hospitals to realize who is responsible for the well-being of patients. And there were many days when I thought, If I’d only been a nurse, I could have kept my profession and still worked part time. I have friends who were able to do this. I had a friend who was a medical doctor and had decided to stay home to care for her four children. She once told me, “I feel like they sold me a bill of goods. They told me I could be a doctor and still have the family life I wanted. I wasn’t willing to make the compromises I had to make.”

It’s a complicated problem, and we’re only skirting around the edges of it with some women and some employers able and willing to work out solutions of working from home, or job sharing (did that ever really work?).

I graduated from college in 1979 as a chemical engineer with the world at my feet. In those days there weren’t a lot of women in the field. We were the women on the leading edge of the wave, they said. And the particular large corporation I worked for held meetings and conferences for the women to teach us about “the old boys network” and train us in assertiveness and how to “dress for success.”  I lasted all of 3-1/2 years until my first child was born and all of my efforts to come back to work on a part-time basis failed. I couldn’t face the prospect of handing this blanket-wrapped bundle into the arms of someone else.

So yes, I dropped off the wave, I let down the women behind me, I bailed out to grasp for myself the family life I wanted to live.

But had things been different, I wouldn’t have been faced with an either/or proposition. Had our society been structured in a different way that wasn’t predicated on a five-day, 8:00 to 5:00 work week, that wasn’t dependent on a division of labor where one spouse earned the money and one stayed home to raise the children, I might have had more choices. Socially, in our family structures, we were still trying to live in the days of Ozzie and Harriet, but professionally we were trying to move on. Society had not caught up—I think it still hasn’t.

So maybe the fact that the women of Princeton don’t run for leadership positions has little to nothing to do with ambition. Perhaps the women of Princeton have watched and learned from the rest of us. Perhaps they are simply being realistic.

Advertisements

Author: CMSmith

I enjoy reading, writing, gardening, photography, genealogy and travel. I have opinions about many things, but am trying to age gracefully and not continually tick people off with them. Sometimes I can’t help myself.

15 thoughts on “Where have all the women gone?”

  1. Thank you for writing this. I went to a college that taught us as women that we could have it all (Smith College). But the reality is that society has not changed to embrace that possibility. There are plenty of women who are capable of doing more or better than the men who hold high positions, but unless there are major changes in the way our country views family, that’s ultimately impossible. If we only had a village to raise children, then we could see real change.

  2. Yes. I always wanted to move to a village where we threw out all the norms and standards and started over with what made sense.

    Unfortunately, we are saddled with this construct and to change it is like moving a mountain. If everyone bailed, change would never happen. So I applaud those individuals who were/are willing to stick it out. And there are rewards to be had for doing so.

    1. I checked out the link. That’s fascinating. Thanks for sharing. I have another friend who is a radiologist and was able to do a lot of her work from home.

      I think things are happening in the right direction, but it is slow, and limited.

  3. No one can “have it all.” Every choice we make precludes other choices.

    Women AND Men cannot be both “full time high powered executive” and “stay at home care giver.”

    I don’t see it as “society’s problem.” Life is full of individual choices that everyone, male or female, must make.

    We must decide where our priorities lie ~ whether it’s in the boardroom or the nursery.

    1. I know what you are saying, but society does play a role. The expectations of who stays at home, or who is responsible for a child when she is sick often are dictated by the community. For example, I would always get the phone call and be expected to take care of Sarah, even though it was harder for me to drop everything and his phone number was listed first. Nathan and I had a discussion, and that problem was solved, but I still got the phone calls.

      1. I agree. Society plays a huge role in our expectations and our opportunities.

        I also agree that life is full of individual choices—it’s the limited number of possible choices that I fault. Some people are successfully cracking that shell open a bit and finding or creating alternate or flexible work schedules, but they are the exceptions and not the rule. And, it’s been over 25 years since I had to make my decision, so some things have changed with time.

        If I had been a nurse I likely could have found part time work. As an engineer in the early 80s, that simply wasn’t true. So, yes, I could have made the choice to be a nurse and be able to work part time or be an engineer and have to work full time. I think there should be more and better choices.

    2. That reminds me of the time we went vacuum cleaner shopping. BFF does the vacuuming . . . so it was going to be HIS new toy.

      He did ALL the talking.
      He asked ALL the questions.
      He asked to take a model for a “test ride.”

      The FEMALE salelady plugged in the machine and started to hand it to ME.

      I through up my hands in mock horror and said, “I don’t want it.”

      She got visibly annoyed and said with biting intensity, “You just said you wanted to try it.”

      I laughed, “No, I didn’t . . . HE did.”

      She finally got the message and BFF got the machine. 😀

  4. Sara Palin and Michelle Bauckman are such morons they have set back the consideration of women for office for I don’t know how long. If I was a woman concerned with these matters I would be horrified. Sara is ignorant and Michelle’s from another planet.

    1. I have felt something akin to horror at times.

      When Sara Palin initially tried to appeal to Hillary Clinton supporters I nearly choked.

      Coming of age in the 70s when the women’s movement was such a big deal, what sometimes seemed to undermine our forward efforts the most was other women who were reinforcing stereotypes, willingly in some cases, unwittingly in others.

    2. Thank you for voicing my opinion. Although I must admit Palin has shaken things up a lot. So maybe we can thank her for getting people up off their backsides to get involved. I just hope the “right” kind of people are involved…the ones that make sense.

Comments

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s